Annaliese Nielsen

a.k.a Lara Nielsen.


Has gotten her 15 minutes of fame.  She’s getting a ride from a Lyft driver who has a Hawaiian bobble headed hula dancer on his dash. Nielsen, a women’s studies moron, starts recording and then berates him for his hula girl for 8 minutes. You can see the video here:

It’s not very pleasant to watch until the other passenger starts being total disgusted by Nielsen’s behavior.  Then it gets really good when the driver drops her off in the middle of nowhere.

She goes on to get him fired, except they rehired him once they saw/heard the video.

Then the fun starts. People get busy on the internet making fun of this nasty woman.  Lots of these memes involve hula girls with her face pasted on.  Some involve pictures of a horse, though I can’t figure out why it’s the front part of the horse. She’s deleted her accounts because of all the well earned harassment she’s getting. She can’t even understand why it’s happening.

I’ve seen this a number of times. Some SJW thinks he will save the world by recording himself being an ass, or killing someone, or sitting down during the national anthem, or shutting down traffic because only black lives matter or some other foolish thing. I say keep mocking them.  Even if they can’t learn, we can have fun at their expense.


Update: Looked at some of this woman’s tweets.  Pretty clear she hates white males.   Thinks it’s somehow wrong for a white male to use something from some other culture.  Guess I better turn in my toyotas. No more sushi! Well wait a second, why does everyone else get to use stuff white males invented?  You scummy leftists giving up your phones, electricity, cars, and computers?  Thought not.  Give me a call when you do



Social Justice Warriors are the Problem

From the Dalrock blog:


The new Red Guards.

Posted on September 23, 2014by Dalrock

Vox succinctly describes Social Justice Warriors:

Social Justice Enforcers would be a more apt term. The SJWs are nothing less than the mutaween of the godless West, the self-appointed enforcers of the would-be globalist elite’s hellish parody of morality.



End quote


Keep this in mind when you listen to the news and the radio. The recent tempest in a teapot over Ray Rice whacking his fiancé comes to mind. None of these SJW’s said boo about his fiancé whacking him first. No criminal charges were made, which pretty much means he’s not guilty. (I’m not saying he was right, but that you can’t always just blame the man without looking at his side.) So now the SJW’s are looking for anything and everything to beat up the NFL. I heard someone suggest they do away with cheerleaders because… what? They’re demeaning to women? They make some people feel fat? I don’t know. Another blogger, whom I can’t find again, noted that a google search of media people (reporters, news anchors etc.) beating up their wives and girlfriends yielded a treasure trove of results. Where’s the outrage over that? Why aren’t we beating up people in the media over their “war on women”? It’s because they are the lead SJW’s and they are busy attacking the NFL right now thank you very much.


Also note that a lot of women do some serious physical damage to the men in their lives. (remember Lorraina Bobbit?) The men in these situations, are in a totally damned no matter what you do situation. If they react like Ray, they may go to prison, lose their jobs and God knows what else. If they report it, they are apparently looked down upon by the cops, and typically nothing happens to the women. You may not believe me, but check it out for yourself, and then ask yourself what happened to Mrs. Ray Rice.


The Matt Walsh Blog has a great article [1] entitled “Sorry, but it’s your fault you’re offended all the time”. He notes the SJW’s are busy assigning motives to things you do so they can be offended. For example if you pull a chair out for a woman or open the door for a woman, then you are performing a “microagression” by implying that she can’t do it herself. These microagressions can be almost anything, like asking someone where they are from, or complimenting them on their hair, or to think Asians might be better at math.


So what can one do?


First, learn to recognize the SJW’s. It’s pretty easy because they use trite, and false phrases constantly. “war on women”, “patriarchy”, “racist”, “white privilege”, “rape culture”, “trigger warning”, “homophobe”, “Eurocentric”, “microagression” and on and on ad nauseum.


Next, just don’t take it. Call them on their BS. Fight. Why? Because they will never give up, and their complaints will just become ever more ridiculous. They will happily destroy you in their never ending crusade. Ask Ray Rice, Brendan Eich(Firefox), or George Zimmerman. If you apologize, which is to admit you were wrong, they now have proof that you are evil. If you say they are wrong and wrong headed, refuse to apologize because after all you have committed no wrong, they lose.


Recognize their lies, don’t believe their lies, and fight their lies. Evil wins if good men sit idly by and do nothing.



Gay Rights? A pathway to hell

Gay, Transgender, confused, queer, lesbian, undecided. The leftists are pushing and glorifying gay and transgender lifestyles. There is some evidence that people are genetically predisposed to be gay. But what were the lives of all these gay people like in the past? I think a lot of them married and had children and just kept everything else … well…”in the closet.” I’m not going to have the argument here whether it’s a choice or biological. But I am going to use the premise that you can have an attraction for the same sex and still marry someone of the opposite sex and raise children. This premise is founded on the idea that people have been doing this for thousands of years.

The left is punishing anyone who tries to speak out against the runaway train that is the gay “rights” movement. They want these lifestyles totally accepted by everyone, arguing that everyone speaking out is somehow afraid of gays. They don’t understand that this so-called “right” that gays have exactly the same life as heterosexuals (or as gays call us “breeders”) is going to create many, many problems in the future.

Some argue that religion doesn’t accept this arrangement. That’s true. Most religions don’t accept same sex marriages, but leftists believe religions are created by people and can therefore be changed by people. I believe my religion was created by God but that many of its moving parts were laid out by people with divine inspiration. The godless left only sees the part created by people and says this can be changed and they have had success with actually changing the workings of some weaker religions.

But I’m not interested in making an argument based on religion. That’s a losing argument because some foolish religions are accepting gay marriage. The left then argues that if some accept, the others are wrong not to accept and must be forced to accept. They will trample on freedom of religion and will ultimately begin sending people to prison if their religion doesn’t conform. I’m going to argue this based on the children of gay parents who will be the train wreck of the runaway gay “rights” train.

I believe most gays won’t have children, but many will want to. I don’t believe they want children for the sake of the children, but to help solidify the illusion that they are living normal acceptable lives. Some gays have children from the period before they decided to go gay. Some adopt. Some go for artificial insemination, and some for paid incubation. Evidence shows gay and lesbian couples are more likely to abuse their children, both sexually and physically. By condoning gay marriage and worse yet gay adoption we as a country will be sanctioning abuse of thousands of children. If you thought the gay priest abuse was bad, wait til you see what’s coming. The press will cover it up, but it’s going to happen, and it will be awful.

Now let’s talk about another subset. This is the group of non-abusive gay parents who have procured children and really want to do what’s best for the children. Right off the bat these kids don’t get either a father figure or a mother figure. Males raised by single mothers have a lot of adjustment problems and adding another mother is not likely to help. Girls also have problems with single mother parenting. I haven’t read extensively the problems of children with single Dad’s but I’m sure they’re there. So, every child raised by single sex couples will have significantly more adjustment issues than ones raised by to sex parents. I have read articles by some of these children who did not appreciate their parent’s choices. Evidence is also mounting that children raised by gay couples are much more likely to have emotional difficulties, have less education, and have lower income. Some may do well, but most will find they start at a disadvantage. It’s bad enough that so many children are already raised in broken homes. Why would we as a society want to assign millions more to this fate just for the vanity of the gay rights movement?

Transgender. Trading in a set of sexual equipment that works for one that doesn’t . Not a win. I’ve seen a few man to freakshow-woman and they have all been hideous. Woman to man can’t be much better. This whole category should come under the heading “bad idea” and should be resisted.

I’ve been debating with myself if civil unions for gays would be ok. I’ve finally concluded that anything that puts their union in the same or similar light to real marriage increases their claim that they should be able to adopt children. Also note the scorn, loathing, and attacks on any who disagree with the gay rights positions. What we see here is a total intolerance for any position but their own. Therefore, I think we need to resist all calls for “rights” or “equality” in terms of gay marriage. I think we should show the same tolerance to the gay rights movement that it shows to anyone who holds a different opinion. To hell with the fucking gay rights movement.